There is a vote to delete Library 2.0 from Wikipedia. I am not going to say anything except quote my comments on the AFD page:
I hate the term. But the very fact that there is a debate around the issue means that that debate should be vocalized. The article should spell out completely the criticisms of the term and let the reader decide.
I would apply this to my philosophy of religion (or the religious at the core of various religions) in general:
It is not good to talk about Zen because Zen is nothingness … If you talk about it you are always lying, and if you don’t talk about it no one knows it is there.
-Robert Pirsig, his “final interview,” in the Observer.
Books canada Classification computers digital culture Digitizing Print dreyfus employment food Free Culture google History hobbies information Information Literacy Internet kierkegaard librarianship library philosophy log driver's waltz master's degree Media national film board Open Access Open Source passion Photography Politics print culture Reading Research Reviews Scholarship School social software technology